• The Eusebius-copying and more

    Noah's ark: new in Muschelkalk limestone, old in Ettringer tuff stone. Tower of St. Eusebius' Church
    Noah's ark: new in Muschelkalk limestone, old in Ettringer tuff stone

    As I already explained in reported yesterday I am currently carving corbels for the tower of the St. Eusebius's Church in Arnhem (the Netherlands).

    The small reliefs that I am carving now generally don't have too many details. To a large extent this is because theEttringer tuff stone in which it was originally carved, isn't very suited for detailed carving: it contains fairly large, sandy bimsspots, that later often wash out, leaving large holes in the stone surface. You might try to carve something in that spot, but your chisel will sink in, unless you have a very wide chisel. You can see those yellow soft spots very well in the picture above.

    The replacement stone is Muschelkalk limestone, a fairly coarse limestone from Germany that matches the character of the tufa around it very well, but is a lot easier to carve and detail in, and apparently is more weather-resistant as well. Because the grain of the Muschelkalk is finer, I also got the opportunity to add a little more detail, but without deviating too much from the original. The idea is that the sculptors at the time would certainly have added more detail if the tuff had allowed it.

    This ark was really something to enhance a bit. With a few windows and the planks of the ship's hull (the waves were already there, but they were very weathered) it's immediately a lot more attractive.

    a corbel with anchor, tower of  St. Eusebius's Church (Arnhem)
    Anchor, new and old

    And then you'll be right on the old debate: what is restoration? Are you going to copy exactly what was there, without adding anything, or is there some room for that little bit extra? These are things I don't think up all on my own. But I am happy with the outcome, it's quite a bit more interesting for me this way, because I don't have to just slavishly copy what was already there, but can put something of myself in it.

    spikes new and old

    The old work has something very playful, what must be a result of carving in the direct carving method, and only after a round on the scaffolding around the tower, I began to see it. That's why the new work should preferably also have that directness, with traces of the chiseling still visible, and carved not quite super crisp and clean. And therefore the Muschelkalk is such a good choice: that coarseness of the tuff partly returns in the new stone, but something more can be made of it.

    But there are also little reliefs that are absolutley unclear as to what they portray. On the left a picture: it is a couple of spiky protrusions, perhaps with a band surrounding it. If you know what it is, you can say it. After a brief discussion, it was decided to leave the mystery intact, and I copied it without much changes.

    Read more…

    To the first message about this restoration project.

  • Location, location, location

    Jan van Velzen

    One of the things I've always admired in the sculptures of my father is the spots he has chosen to put them. My dad is a sculptor from the village of Onderdijk, Jan van Velzen. With several of his sculptures he got the opportunity to personally pick their destined spot, something that is not always left to the artist. His first big sculpture was The Dijkwerker, a labourer building the Dutch dikes,

    a bronze statue of a man digging. Unlike most sculptures of dikers, this one is not of a man placing blocks of basalt, because in these areas the dykes were originally built from clay, that was moved with shovels and wheelbarrows.

    It was his first major assignment. He was noticed as a sculptor when he made a design for a statue of St. Gerard Majella some years before. The parish existed 70 years and as part of a cabaret with drum band and great fanfare at the end a 'new statue ’ of St. Gerard Maiella was unveiled, supposedly for in the church.

    Bulbs Rooi Ende horticulturist (St Gerard Majella) by Jan van Velzen

    I think my father cannot be dienied a certain quirkiness in those years. Apparently he had nothing with the traditional devout image of Gerardus, because he decided that Majella had been a simple man, and chose to portray him as the people around him: a small scale farmer, on his knees in the clay. Bare-chested.

    What happened was to be expected of course: Little Gerard on his knees was a step too far for the parishioners. Worth a smile in hindsight. So I don't think my father expected that this image would seriously get a place in the Church. That was never the intent. But the modelling had fueled his creativity again and was the incentive to get asked for making the Dike Worker.

    I was seventeen at the time, and thought I might perhaps be a little bit creative, but that I could never be a sculptor like my father. I had so little confidence in myself in that respect that I've never tried getting to an art academy.

    Jan van Velzen wax Mother and Child

    But I found the work on the Dike Worker fascinating. For my father working in this scale was all new, too, and while he learned, I learned along with him. Working with Styrofoam and wax, enlarging, modelling, Moving the wax model on location to discuss the best place. I wrote a paper about it when I did a training at the MTS of Graphic in Amsterdam.

    VanVelzen Dike worker 1981

    The image is now placed in a large open space, at the end of the village, approximately in between Onderdijk and Wervershoof. When around the end of 1980 while walking with my mother he had chosen this place, us children were horrified at first. It was still one big mud hole at the time, with a new pumping station and a few big canals, in a place where few people bothered to look with interest. Didn't such a sculpture fit better in the heart of the village?

    In hindsight, I can only say that he had been right all along. The statue immediately draws attention because of the lack of all kinds of disturbing elements, the mud gave way to grass and trees and blossoming Roxy, and the Dike Worker has become a landmark for the village .

    Dike worker Jan van Velzen

    It strikes me that an appealing statue has the ability to influence the environment. I am thinking, for example, of how 'The Best Navigators’ on the pier of Medemblik have made a prime spot out of a place with an end-of-the-world feel, because all of a sudden it became clear that the environment needed care. The mess gets cleaned up, The path is paved or updated, the shrubs and grass are kept and what was a forlorn place gets allure. Same way with the piece of land behind the Drommedaris in Enkhuizen, that because of‘Paulus Potter’ from an empty dog's field suddenly gets focus and turns into a photo location.

    Yet there was a man from Wervershoof who said he thought it was a Onderdijk oriented sculpture, and asked: 'Didn't you overdo it a little too much?’ How come, asked my father. ‘Weeeeellll’, was the West Frisian answer, 'It's a nice sculpture alright, no arguing, but he's turned his ass in the direction of Wervershoof, that's why!’

No more messages to show.

No more messages to show.