• An interesting gable stone

    Last week I started on a very interesting challenge: the carving of a new gable stone relief. The project deserves some explanation, because it includes a lot more than just this one relief.

    A plaque in the making for the Blue Tram street in Haarlem

    Remisewijk in Haarlem

    In total it involves ten new gable stone reliefs for the new area in Haarlem which used the endpoint and the remittance of the tram and bus. Now theFoundationfor Gable stone reliefsAssociationHaarlem (SGVH) conceived the plan to have for every street in this new building project (ten in total) a new gable stone relief carved. And because Haarlem is a comic book town, the idea came up to heve these designed by ten different cartoonists and then get them carved into stone by ten different stone sculptors. I was asked for plaque number ten, designed by cartoonist Toon van Driel, known for, among others, FC Knudde, De Stamgasten and his daily comic for De Telegraaf.

    The commission was that the significance of the street name should be represented in the design of the cartoonist, together with his or her cartoon character/characters or clearly recognizable characteristics of his own comics work. Next, the sculptors will start carving this design three-dimensionally into stone, and polychromy. The SVGH writes: ‘The SGVHwantmake the history of this place as a tram and bus depot visible by placing a facade stone near the street name signs in the area that depicts where the street name comes from.The idea arose because. some decades ago comic artist Theo van den Boogaard drew many comic posters for the NZH bus line. (…) This way, a beautiful public art work is created in the district, covering 10 streets.For the cartoonist, this is a chance to get his comic portrayed in stone. For Haarlem to promote the comics city.’

    Refreshing

    In genreal, we consider gable stone reliefs as something of a distant past, when these were the house signs instead of the house numbers we now know. But occasionally there are still assignments for new house signs, and there are still a number of artists who regularly get these kinds of commissions. I also carved, at a time when I didn't take regular pictures of my work, some house signs or gable stones every once in a while. It remained incidentally however. Generally, these reliefs are appreciated very much, but issuing a commission is another matter entirely. In that sense I think it's a unique event that SVGH has taken this initiative and a project has found a developer willing to cooperate. The cooperation with the cartoonists is a stroke of genius, ensuring a refreshing kind of cross-pollination between traditional craft and contemporary vision.

    Design and implementation

    The relief that I'm carving now hasToon van Driel's typical sense of humor. We see a penguin about to enter a tram, while complaining it's late. The tram is on an ice floe in the Antarctic Ocean. It is the characteristic blue tram after which the street was named.

    For his plaque I bought a piece of Udelfanger sandstone of 54 x 62 cms wide, with a thickness of 12 cms wide. I started with transferring the contours of the drawing onto the stone. We're not being too fussy about that: I just stick the printout onto the stone with tape, and carve right through the paper. Done. After that I decide the depth for each part, and start carving from low to high parts as blocks of contours.  Only after that comes the shaping of the components. This way, I need to measure very little and will always keep my reference points. An explanation of this method can be found here and here. Because I was asked to make a real relief with considerable depth differences I made good use of the material. The deepest part is about 8 cms deep. Personally I love it best when it's all got quite a bit of volume; for me, a flat picture that is just carved in outlines doesn't yet make it into a proper relief!

    Arts and crafts, applied design

    Now you might have already guessed that I have a great weakness for construction sculpture. Spatial design without high pretensions applied in the context of a building, preferably with both a practical and a decorative function. In the past, capitals have been made with sculptures on them, columns in the form of heavy load bearing men and women (atlants and cariatids), corner blocks with decorations, entrances, consoles, all sorts of things. Unfortunately for the last fifty years a building will rarely get a decorative or sculpted ornament. It would be nice to be able to design and execute sculptures again for new buildings too. Sometimes something modern will happen, like the new City Hall of Deventer, which is decorated with 2300 fingerprints. But it's far from standard procedure such as for example the construction sculpture of the Amsterdam School was in the years 1910 to approximately 1930.

    Some examples of sculpture that I have had the opportunity to replace in recent years in different types of stone.

    New times, new designs

    Yet in the past 24 years I've been fortunate to carve lots of things that were used in facades of buildings: wreaths and garlands, spirals, consoles, capitals, crest stones, house signs and more. Construction Sculpture has a supporting role, it adds something to its environment, without all wanting to pull all the attention to itself.  It would be wonderful to design a whole entrance in stone, or a cornice. In modern style, with flowing lines and a subtle tension that complement the geometric shapes of the architect. A collaboration between the architect or designer and sculptor can of course work mutually stimulating.

    Though I think there's still a lot of unfamiliarity with the possibilities and some cold feet among architects- and construction industry. I also find a preference for very crisply computer milled work, something that's usually not feasible by hand. Undoubtedly one day a turning point in the opposite direction will come , but I wonder if I will live to see the day.

    Read more…

  • Cunning & Cheating.Inc

    Jan Vermeer van Delft 014

    It's holiday time, and besides some paint work to my house I also have some more time to follow my interests. It must have to do with that paint job, that I'm totally fascinated by a documentary that I found on the internet. It's about an old discussion: When is something art and when not? Inspired by two books on the use of optics in art, entrepreneur and video expert Tim Jenison decides to initiate his own research into the use of a camera obscura by Johannes Vermeer.

    secretknowledge

    Of these two books, one I knew already: 'Secret Knowledge’ by the well known British painter David Hockney. With a convincing explanation and an abundance of beautiful pictures, in my opinion he shows quite clear that the old masters, since about Jan van Eyck and Rogier van der Weijden, masterfully managed to make use of mirrors and lenses. The other book by Philip Steadman, ‘Vermeer’s Camera’, I didn't know yet. Steadman is an architect and succeeds in finding the approximate setup of Vermeer's camera obsura from measurements of Vermeer's work .

    As was to be expected, for a number of art connoisseurs this touched a sore spot. This gave rise to some very fierce reactions, and as it goes when people can't win, often the man was tackled instead of the facts.

    Reproducing with a lense

    Tim Jenison is not a painter, as he admits himself. He was just fascinated by the discoveries of Hockney and Steadman and wanted to see if he could approach Vermeer's way of working via these tools, and could reproduce it. Apparently he is an extremely versatile man: he soon discovers his own version of the camera lucida that Hockney described in his book and begins to paint a copy of a black-and-white photograph of his father in law.

    In the full version of the film (to be found at the bottom of this blog post) Jenison single-handedly rebuilds the whole room of Vermeer in Delft, including all the furniture, finds a brilliant solution for the optical problem and paints his own version of The Music Lesson by Johannes Vermeer. A versatile man with many talents and especially enormous patience.

    Cheating.Inc?

    The ensuing heated discussions (nothing wrong with that, according to me these just add to more understanding) regularly give me the impression that some art connoisseurs feel that Jenisons theory would decrease the respect for the mastery of Vermeer. Strange actually, because Jenison never claimed that Vermeer's work would be 'just a little trick’ that anyone can do, nor that he would achieve the same level of proficiency. He just tried to show that his solution could have been quite possible in Vermeer's time. (Read here a very comprehensive discussion between Tim Jenison and critics about perception, optics and more, with photos, drawings and backgrounds)

    We should know better; after all everyone now has access to a reasonable camera, but that won't make everyone a top photographer. Coincidentally I recently thoroughly explored the website of Dutch top photographer Erwin Olaf (here an article about his photos of the Relief of Leiden). He portrays his scenes as Vermeer and Van Dijck did, playing with light, and yes, he also uses a camera. Should you then call cheats?

    For me this was not as much news. For sculptors do precisely the same! We may not work with lenses, but if there is a new technology that makes it easier to create what we have in mind, then why not? Measuring with a compass, or an pointing machine, or a scan with a computer-controlled router… is that really so much different to what Vermeer would do with a lense? Does it make him less brilliant if he used a lense than just measuring with a thumb on his brush?

    Trying it out for yourself

    Tim Jennison's comparison device that allows him to paint a copy without sketching-SONY PICTURES CLASSICS
    Tim Jenison's comparator device with which he can paint a copy without sketching first (Sony Pictures Classics)

    And now I want to build a few of these devices myself. Firstly, that Camera Lucida that Hockney describes and the mirror device of Jenison. Tim Jenison states he made it with a microphone stand, a part of a photo tripod and a mirror with the shiny layer on the front instead of at the rear (a first layer mirror). I was wondering how in the world to come by such a mirror, but on the internet there is a solution to everything. Just buy a packet of mirror tiles at the hardware store, dissolve the grey protective layer on the backside with acetone, et voilà, you end up with a mirror with the reflective layer on the front. Adjust that to 45 degrees and you're ready to go. Now Jenison is working on a horizontal painting canvas, but I suspect that the canvas can also stand on an upright easel, with the mirror to the side instead of above the canvas.

    Videos

    Below the fascinating (long) film Tim's Vermeer. Those who can find the time should actually see the two videos with David Hockney underneath first.

    (update: apparently the video on Dailymotion now been removed. Unfortunately. Hence now the trailer below. I did manage to find the movie in lower quality elsewhere on the Web:

    Try to see the full video here)

    David Hockney’s Secret Knowledge 1

    David Hockney’s Secret Knowledge 2

No more messages to show.

No more messages to show.